Where LiteSpeed differs from Apache is in its architecture. I noticed the plugin is listed as active on more than 100,000 sites, with nearly all 5-star reviews. If you happen to use WordPress like I do, LiteSpeed offers a plugin specifically to make use of its cache. There’s also an enterprise version that does more and costs more. The cost of the proprietary version isn’t prohibitive at $14/month to lease or $249 to own. Instead configuration is though a web interface. The downside to OpenLiteSpeed is that it doesn’t read Apache’s configuration files or completely support. It is proprietary like IIS, but there’s an open-source version called OpenLiteSpeed. htaccess files so that it doesn’t need to check every directory for the file, removing the performance overhead. LiteSpeed also offers a built-in cache, including intelligent caching for. It’s also compatible with all of Apache’s core modules. You can replace an existing Apache server with a LiteSpeed server in a short amount of time, measured in minutes, and with no downtime to your site. LiteSpeed can read Apache configuration files.
Litespeed web server vs nginx code#
If the term is new to you, it means you can replace Apache with LiteSpeed without having to make any other code or configuration changes. LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS)Īs I said, LiteSpeed is a drop-in replacement for Apache. I also want to share a few performance tests I ran on this site both before and after my hosting company moved my account to newer server hardware.
Today I want to talk about one more application for running a server, LiteSpeed, which is a drop-in replacement for Apache. My focus has been on the architecture of each in order to point out their performance pros and cons.
Litespeed web server vs nginx software#
The last few weeks I’ve been talking about server software offering posts on Apache, NGNINX, and IIS.
I started with a couple of posts about hosting plans and server hardware. However, switching from Apache to Nginx is a bit tricky and hard.For most of the last two months, I’ve been talking about website performance, specifically as it relates to server response times. You can always switch to LiteSpeed web server later. One thing we can suggest is that if you are starting a website, Apache is most probably the best option for you. Each website has its own needs and you need to carefully compare and consider each web server’s features and choose the one that matches your needs the best. In the end, we can’t obviously tell you which web server is the best for everyone. There are lots of other amazing features about Nginx which we talked about them in the post about Nginx before. So they have a similar function in the security subjects. So this is a very popular web server for websites with lots of views.įortunately, both Nginx and LiteSpeed use ModSecurity rules and protect server from multiple attacks. The best thing about Nginx is that it can handle a high number of visits. Now let’s say some of the good features of Nginx. LiteSpeed web server and Apache can be controlled by control panels like DirectAdmin, cPanel and Plesk. Also one of the biggest weak points of Nginx is that it can’t read. LiteSpeed can read all the Apache files like mod_rewrite, mod_security but Nginx can’t do the same.